(Pictures are worth some number of words you know.)
If markets are efficient then price movements happen because of news that changes the value of assets. Often however stock prices seem to fluctuate even in the absence of any new information. On Black Monday in 1987, US stocks dropped by more than 20% without any obvious reason in terms of information about fundamentals. Are asset price movements simply random, or worse, a result of manipulation?
The question is impossible to answer using data from today’s markets. How can you independently identify what is news? And even when there is verifiably no news how can you rule out the possibility that prices moved precisely because of the absence of some expected good or bad news?
Peter Koudijs has found a wonderful historical episode in which it is possible to identify precisely the days in which news arrives and to measure the effect of news on stock prices. During the 18th century there were a few English companies whose stock was traded both in London and in exchanges in Amsterdam. When the prices of these stocks changed in London, information about the price movements reached Amsterdam via mail boats that crossed the North Sea. When weather prevented these boats from crossing, news was delayed. These weather events enable him to show that a large component of price volatility is directly attributable to the arrival of news. This dramatic picture pretty much summarizes it:
On the 19th of November, shares of the British East India Company (EIC) began to drop in response to a speech given by British Prime Minister Fox who spoke of “the deplorable state” of its fiances. Bad weather delayed the arrival of boats from England to Amsterdam until around the 27th of November. In the intervening period, there was little change in the price of EIC shares on the Amsterdam exchange. But as soon as the boats arrive, the stock price dropped to the level seen on the London exchange a week earlier.
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 24, 2011 at 12:58 pm
David Pinto
Before the 1987 crash, did some big market advisor tell his clients to sell?
January 24, 2011 at 1:16 pm
Noto
Very cool!
Graduate students, take note: in general, the best empirical papers have a “killer graph” like that. Doug Almond’s JPE paper is a good example, as is Greenstone-Chay (JPE). If you can summarize your paper in a single picture, there’s a good chance the reader will be able to remember your findings.
January 25, 2011 at 6:52 am
Mort dubious
So what? That incident happened in a world where news was scarce and valuable. Today news is abundant and usually worthless. It also arrives everywhere simultaneously. I would be very careful about extrapolating from the past. The answer to your query is that news had an effect on asset prices at least once. Whether you can form a law based on that incident is another question.
March 28, 2011 at 1:10 am
My Prediction « Cheap Talk
[…] I previously blogged about Torgovitsky, Mahoney, and Koudijs. […]